Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > Sardelac Sanitarium

Notices

View Poll Results: Make all new game books retroactive out of fairness all anniversary dates.
I'm new to the game and don't care. 1 9.09%
It's a nice idea, but too much trouble for game programers. 1 9.09%
Gamer programers should be able to do this if they can. 5 45.45%
DO IT! If you can't do this then how can we expect GW2 to be well balanced and fair? 5 45.45%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 11. This poll is closed

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Dec 05, 2008, 12:43 AM // 00:43   #1
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Knights Australia
Profession: R/A
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Exclamation Please make new game books retroactive like you did for EOTN!

Please make new game books retroactive like you did for EOTN! It isn't fair that only new players are rewarded for all of their PVE time over the years. We should be able to receive our first game book reward as gratis for our loyalty alone, let alone all of the time and money spent. ARE YOU ALL WITH ME OUT THERE?

johneric
johneric is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 01:03 AM // 01:03   #2
Furnace Stoker
 
pumpkin pie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
Default

bad poll choices can't vote.

on principal i'd vote no, don't make the book retroactive. Because making the book retroactive its like the recent: buy second campaign at 50% off when you buy any campaign from our online store promotion. Making the book retroactive is like this: hey, you have to refund 50% for all and every of my second purchase from the online store, because I bought many and there are a lot of 50% off there that I want the promotion to be retroactive. but is it fair to do that?

however I am not going to vote anything on any topic related to this, because I am going to sit on the fence, you know where I stand, and even if Arena Net decide to make the book retroactive I don't loose anything. lol i just don't subscribe to that idea of making the book retroactive. but if it is, no harm to me.

back to the fence.

Last edited by pumpkin pie; Dec 05, 2008 at 01:12 AM // 01:12..
pumpkin pie is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 01:38 AM // 01:38   #3
Desert Nomad
 
Puebert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: Mo/
Default

You need to make the option "No" on your poll.

Then lets talk.
Puebert is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 01:40 AM // 01:40   #4
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ascalon
Profession: E/
Default

Someone didn't bother to read the dev update notes, huh?

Quote:
Storybook Retroactivity

Storybook NPCs allow players to purchase the pages of missions completed without having the book in inventory. However, we decided not to allow players to purchase the pages of missions that were completed prior to the update. This was a difficult decision to make, but an important one.

We monitor the economy closely and found a significant fluctuation in how much gold players had on average after the addition of the M.O.X. quests (which give a 10 platinum reward). If we allowed players to purchase those pages, any character that had completed all three campaigns in Normal Mode would be receiving 18 platinum and 42,750 gold for Hard Mode completion for a grand total of 60,750 gold. In light of how much the economy was affected by just 10 platinum, the inflation caused by giving out 60 platinum per character was too significant for us to allow.
DarkFlame is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 01:43 AM // 01:43   #5
Atra esternĂ­ ono thelduin
 
Eragon Zarroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madness Incarnate
Guild: [Duo]
Profession: W/P
Default

If they felt it should be retroactive, they would have made it so during implementation. It won't happen so give it up. Besides, the benefit per person would be minimal while it would at the same time generate a large influx of cash into the game giving a few platinum to every single player that completed factions, nightfall, and or prophecies. Guild Wars economy is bloated enough as it is.
Eragon Zarroc is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 02:04 AM // 02:04   #6
Departed from Tyria
 
Shayne Hawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Guild: Clan Dethryche [dth]
Profession: R/
Default

QQ thread, go.

Really, the only people who should be whining about this getting implemented are people who don't want to play the game the way it was meant to be played. Plus, ANet as already established a good position on why they didn't do this.
Shayne Hawke is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 02:11 AM // 02:11   #7
Forge Runner
 
Lady Lozza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Guild: Angel Sharks
Profession: Me/N
Default

I'm not sure how "good" that position is when they could remove the monetary reward for retroactive books. The main benefit is for Alliance Faction, which is no small deal. Regardless, this topic was discussed to death at the time of the update. This poll does not represent all the opinions on the matter, or even the key ones. It CAN be done, Anet has chosen not to do it. I sure can't see them doing it at this stage and I'm not sure I really care.
Lady Lozza is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 02:36 AM // 02:36   #8
Furnace Stoker
 
Dzjudz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: gwpvx.com/user:dzjudz
Default

In before the lock: THEY WON'T DO IT, KEEP UP!!
Dzjudz is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 03:18 AM // 03:18   #9
Permanently Banned
 
Calista Blackblood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Ireland
Guild: Nowhere To Run Nowhere To [Hide]
Profession: N/
Default

The dead horse has been flogged enough
__________________
The best goodbyes are like a knife in the dark: short, simple and to the point
Calista Blackblood is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 03:30 AM // 03:30   #10
Jungle Guide
 
wind fire and ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: There
Guild: [ToA]
Default

the answer is no,just how it is,and it will stay that way.
wind fire and ice is0  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 03:38 AM // 03:38   #11
Forge Runner
 
Lykan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Guild: StP
Profession: R/
Default

How about the "They have already told us no and pretty convincingly explained why so whining is a waste of time" option?
Lykan is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 04:25 AM // 04:25   #12
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Default

I already made a topic about this and anet stated its to prevent the money accumulated from it from hurting the economy.

Yea...it's not like they can remove the money reward for retroactive books..and it's not like they haven't given SEVERAL friends of mine MILLIONSSSS via Zkeys for logging into their site once a month. That would almost be as harmful to the economy as 60k once for going to the right npcs.

Basically everyone is full of it, doesn't matter anyway rewards not worth crap. Now wait for your Zkeys
What Now is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 05:01 AM // 05:01   #13
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Riding the spiral
Profession: W/
Default

Your idea of being ignorant, ranting about something you didn't know, not giving people the option to disagree, and then insulting everyone who still does, really isn't very effective. Good try though.

As others said, it'd be too much $ in the market. And the poll needs "no".
Mortal Amongst Mere Gods is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 06:21 AM // 06:21   #14
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Knights Australia
Profession: R/A
Arrow Vented

I got their reasons, but I still hope they will come up with something for the old timers. You know . . . maybe not change their minds, but alter them a bit.

Guess this whole thread might as well be locked at this point.
johneric is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 06:39 AM // 06:39   #15
Ooo, pretty flower
 
Konig Des Todes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Citadel of the Decayed
Guild: The Archivists' Sanctum [Lore]
Profession: N/
Default

Enough time has passed on this, ANet said they won't, ANet said why they didn't.


Give. It. Up.

+1 to deletion. (Don't see the point of closing threads other then to say why it was closed - just delete them!)
Konig Des Todes is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 07:00 AM // 07:00   #16
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ascalon
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by What Now View Post
Yea...it's not like they can remove the money reward for retroactive books
Really, cause the whole point of turning them in isn't for the gold, but the title points right? I can turn in the Factions book for my Lux/Kurz titles. And my NF book for my SS/LB title. And my Proph book for... for 5-6 skill points?

Quote:
it's not like they haven't given SEVERAL friends of mine MILLIONSSSS via Zkeys for logging into their site once a month.
Which doesn't happen to involve making the right predictions and then finding someone to buy your z-keys/getting lucky on the z-chest, right? While everyone and their grandmas are trying to do the same?

Quote:
That would almost be as harmful to the economy as 60k once for going to the right npcs.
Once, for each char. Free 540k for me then.

Quote:
doesn't matter anyway rewards not worth crap.
Yay, we agree. So whats all the qq'ing about again?

Last edited by DarkFlame; Dec 05, 2008 at 07:03 AM // 07:03..
DarkFlame is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 07:32 AM // 07:32   #17
Desert Nomad
 
Wrath of m0o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boston Ma.
Guild: Is That Your Build[HaHa]
Profession: P/W
Default

Remove the Gold from the Books...problem solved.
You would have to be on Crack if you were farming the books for gold anyway.

Last edited by Wrath of m0o; Dec 05, 2008 at 07:36 AM // 07:36..
Wrath of m0o is offline  
Old Dec 05, 2008, 09:11 AM // 09:11   #18
The 5th Celestial Boss
 
Cebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Inverness, Scotland
Guild: The Cult of Scaro [WHO]
Profession: E/
Default

This has not only been suggested before:

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ight=storybook

...but has also been cried over enough. Please always search for existing threads before posting new ones in Sardelac.

/Locked.
__________________
Knowledge is a process of piling up facts; wisdom lies in their simplification.
Cebe is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marverick Sardelac Sanitarium 21 Dec 02, 2008 12:29 AM // 00:29
New Books, Retroactive? What Now The Riverside Inn 244 Nov 22, 2008 06:09 AM // 06:09
Make Z-Keys Retroactive Kerwyn Nasilan Sardelac Sanitarium 21 May 19, 2008 03:48 AM // 03:48
Make the books worth more! Series Sardelac Sanitarium 28 Sep 14, 2007 12:53 PM // 12:53
Priest Of Sin Sardelac Sanitarium 49 Dec 14, 2006 06:29 AM // 06:29


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 PM // 12:50.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("